• its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    And the assumption you must take through the entire process is scepticism. You assume you’re wrong and try to prove that. You look for holes in your theory and try to find any issues in those holes. I’m not seeing any attempts at that.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      You literally just made up a baseless argument that the researchers aren’t doing due diligence. I’m skeptical of your thesis and I’m not seeing any attempt on your part to provide any supporting evidence for it.

      • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        From our conversation so far I’m not surprised.

        Edit: I’m not claiming the proof doesn’t exist. I’m reminding you over and over that you and the researchers failed to provide it.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          And I’m reminding you over and over that it’s completely beside the point. I’m sure when they publish the research they will provide the reasoning for their hypothesis, and how they tested it. Then other researchers will examine their findings, and point out problems with the research if they exist. That’s how scientific process actually works.