• Twongo [she/her]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    it’s a lifetime lease and prevents the accumulation of generational wealth in real estate. not flawless but generally still miles better than what westerners have. (nothing)

      • Twongo [she/her]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        the fact that real estate is dirt cheap and therefore it’s not a feasible way to become a leech (landlord) and live off rent because it’ll not pay off

        • OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s not backing it up, that’s saying “nu uh” in an echo chamber.

          Do better. Cause I actually want proof. Like, please, give me proof it’s better.

          • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            You are sealioning right now. You’re asking someone else to do a shit ton of work under the guise of “just asking questions” pretending to have healthy discourse.

            A lot of this sites people suck and its filled with people justifying absurd things, but right here, you are asking a question so open ended its tantamount to asking for a thesis paper, and those would still be scrutinized.

          • causepix@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Uh if the 90% overall homeownership rate isn’t “backing it up” I want to know how you define “better”

              • causepix@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Why? Do you have evidence that suggests otherwise? Is there a particular reason you’re so adamant that China’s system must be worse than the commodified system we have in the west?

                • OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I’m not being adamant and I don’t hold that opinion. That’s why I’m asking for sources.

                  Until told otherwise, I hold that it’s just as bad as every other system. None are good, just different.

                  • causepix@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    You realize you can type “china homeownership rate” into any search engine and find a wealth of information? Even from outlets that are generally deeply biased against China. It’s a pretty strong consensus.

                    Waiting for information to come to you is only going to expose you to narratives that someone has a vested interest in putting in front of you. Someone that’s trained and paid to pander to you is going to do it a lot better than a regular well-meaning person that belongs to your class and shares your material interests.