King@r.nf to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoTurmoil at OpenAI shows we must address whether AI developers can regulate themselvestheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1142arrow-down113
arrow-up1129arrow-down1external-linkTurmoil at OpenAI shows we must address whether AI developers can regulate themselvestheconversation.comKing@r.nf to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareubermeisters@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up64·1 year agoNobody can regulate themselves. There. I made a whole lot of things easier.
minus-squareCharlesMangione@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 year agoAn artificial intelligence designed to the task could, but
minus-squarehersh@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoBut then it will follow hallucinated regulations.
minus-squaregedaliyah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·1 year agoMy conspiracy theory is that AI is already running OpenAI, which explains all the weird erratic decisions
minus-squarepdxfed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWhat do you mean we weren’t trained on boardroom shadow takeovers by 49% non-voting members scenarios?
Nobody can regulate themselves. There. I made a whole lot of things easier.
An artificial intelligence designed to the task could, but
But then it will follow hallucinated regulations.
My conspiracy theory is that AI is already running OpenAI, which explains all the weird erratic decisions
What do you mean we weren’t trained on boardroom shadow takeovers by 49% non-voting members scenarios?
deleted by creator