• BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    22 hours ago

    So what? Lots of people do that. Do you think any named building on any campus has that name as a tribute?

    No, somebody donated a bunch of money to that university, hospital, museum, etc. to build a building, with the specific stipulation that it will have their name on the front. If the answer is No, they’ll just offer their donation to the next college. Someone will take them up on it.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      There’s even a difference between someone paying to have their name on a new building and someone renaming something that already exists though.

      Same in sports where a stadium has always been known by a name then it changes for sponsorship reason, it just doesn’t feel right. If the sponsor’s name was attached from opening then it’s fine.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Valid. Ill take it one step farther, and say that Trump’s actions were worse than even changing the name. The Kennedy Center is a tribute to Kennedy in the same way as the Lincoln Memorial or the Washington Monument. Making it the Trump-Lincoln Memorial or the Trump-Washington Monument would be a ludicrous idea, so why is making it the Trump-Kennedy Center acceptable?

        • Mantzy81@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Nobody thinks that the renaming to Trump-Kennedy Centre is acceptable. Hence many of the acts booked in have cancelled upcoming shows.

            • Mantzy81@aussie.zoneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              They do, but they are still the minority. Another minority care (the normal people) and all those who don’t want to be associated with anything Trump/Maga - this includes the artists. The majority don’t care either way and are apathetic. Honestly, they’re half the problem too who either don’t vote or don’t think about it and think life just happens around them and they have no say - they’re the disillusioned and need bringing back into the fold and made to realise they can help fix the mess and that they have a say .

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        My point is that rich people pay to put their own names on stuff all the time. They clearly see that issue differently. They aren’t waiting around for someome to honor them, they are proactive, and honor themselves.

        • bbboi@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          people pay to put their own names on stuff all the time

          Yes. That’s what this post was about. I guess a more pointed question is “what did your comment contribute to the conversation?”.

        • Mantzy81@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Anyone honouring themselves is cringe. It’s like putting your own name forward for an award. If someone doesn’t do it for you, you’re not a winner