My drip maker shuts off. This is very frustrating, since no human should attempt the consumption of six cups of coffee within thirty minutes.

I’d like to get rid of this timer, but I can’t see anything obvious on the board. Is it most likely to be in that little processor at the top left of the coated side?

lmao some of these replies are exactly the sort of thing you’d expect from reddit in like, 2011. For reference, even mildly scalded coffee tastes better than that instant shite, and I’m not drinking ut for taste.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is what I would do if I’m dedicated enough to this laziness and didn’t care about starting a fire in my house:

    • The switching voltage is 12V I assume from the datasheet and model number. I’d measure the voltage of the relay (the biggest black box) on the lower side with a multimeter when on if I want to be sure.
    • I’d disconnect the positive end of the low side of the relay.
    • I’d attach it to a SPDT switch. Middle pin to the relay, side pin to the previous connection on the circuit board.
    • The other side I’d connect a 12V input or whatever was measured. I’d use 8AA batteries or a 12V power supply, and 1k ohm resistor connected in series, and if that didn’t work I’d try a couple other resistance values.
    • So the switch would be normal operation in one position, and then always off or on in the other depending if my power supply is functioning.
    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      This thread is about removing unwanted features from kitchen appliances, not a debate over how the guy should enjoy his coffee according to you.

  • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Leaving coffee on the burner makes it taste worse than reheating it from cold in the microwave. That and a fire hazard is why coffee makers cut off the hot plate so quickly compared to older models.

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I bought a drip coffee maker… there is zero timer, it will never shit off unless I manually toggle it off or unplug it. this is a 6 month old coffee maker.

      bought SPECIFICALLY because it had ZERO ‘features’.

      • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Okay. Nothing about my comment was supposed to imply that it’s not possible. My comment was reminding OP that there is probably a reason why his doesn’t do that, and that reason is probably informed by the quality of the parts used to make his coffee brewer in particular. I’m not saying it’s impossible to make them that way. The manufacturer chose not to do it, and that alone should make you wonder what they changed because of that decision.

        • northernscrub@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          ah, I should have cottoned on in my first reply. the reason it switches off is EU regulation, not for any safety reasons. The machine otherwise looks exactly the same as any kther coffee maker in the world.

    • northernscrub@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The fire hazard is no greater for removing the timer, there’s a bimetallic strip in there that will detach from circuit if the thing gets over 90ish degrees. It’ll just keep cycling like that. Microwaving coffee tastes, in my opinion, worse.

      • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        If it’s functioning correctly that is true, but eventually that part can break, and if each use is 4 times longer than the current setting it increases the chance it could break. Even if that mechanical component is devilishly simple. Both reheating and keeping it warm breaks down the sweet and acidic elements leaving the bitter taste. The difference is reheating a single cup will do this less (especially if you use a lower powered setting on your microwave) vs continuing to do this to the whole pot as you come back to it over and over. Your preference might just be your own desire for that acidic taste or caramelizing of other elements added to the brew for flavor. My suggestion would be to just make less more often, or get a hot plate and move the pot over to that instead.

        Edit: I also meant to say that those mechanical temperature control parts are made much cheaper than in the past.

      • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 hours ago

        And they engineered that feature and tested that feature and supported those parts to make sure they can do that for the life of the machine. I’d bet your Ninja also cost more than OPs brewer.

        • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 hours ago

          That is a possibility. I have found that there are some things on which one should not sacrifice quality if one can afford it.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I’m a big boy. I don’t need my kitchen appliances making decisions for me.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Or get a coffeemaker that brews directly into a carafe. Black and Decker usually goes for $75, and the coffee stays at a drinkable temp for 3+hrs

  • PumpUpTheJam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I would rather drink one well made cup of drip coffee followed by the piss that coffee produced, than coffee that’s been sat on a hot plate for 30+ minutes.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Wait until you find out there’s a lot of people that like burnt cheap coffee.

      They’re over represented in the “previous military service” and “blue collar shift worker” demographics.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      you and me are different, and that’s okay

      I appreciate good coffee. I don’t care enough to have it on a work day when I just want something hot enough that I don’t drink it all immediately and with some caffeine in it because I have a severe caffeine addiction that’s developed over years and years that I haven’t addressed yet

      I will rebrew coffee grounds in my single cup maker because I am that lazy and do not give a fuck about it being shit weak tea that it produces on the third rebrew. my recent upgrade was to using a regular drip machine again and I chose to lower the bean amount to near piss water levels to compensate for the fact that I was previously getting less and less caffeine with each brew whereas now it’s just equalized across all cups

      there are a couple reasons I drink coffee, and how I drink it is reflected clearly by them:

      • caffeine addiction (withdrawal headaches)
      • I want to drink something at my desk, and not always just water (I do drink tea sometimes but idk it just doesn’t hit the same and I don’t like the taste as much once it cools)

      I make better coffee backcountry camping than I do at home

      yw for the horror story

  • BootLoop@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    This is probably a bad idea, because the timer relay circuit probably has some additional safety features in it such as temperature limits, along with the device never being designed to run indefinitely.

    If I had to guess, the heating element is controlled by the relay (big black cube). I would either bypass the output or bypass the input signal. The relay pinout can be easily found online on sites like this.

    https://www.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/view/1133195/SANYOU/SRD-S-112DM.html

    • northernscrub@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It almost certainly is designed to run indefinitely, this exact same coffee maker has been in production since the nineties or so. the only addition is the timer circuit, which is very clearly a much later addition, as the supporting structure is markedly different tk the rest of the device.

      Anyway, a 240v switch is in order, I think. Fortunately we still have Farnell here in the UK, I shouldn’t like to pay international shipping fees for a single switch from china.

    • 0x0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Bridging brown and red or whatever colours not blue and white are will bypass the board entirely.

      If that is the only pcb in the device op should be able to just put any (mains capable!) switch there to just toggle the entire device on/off

  • Hyaline_Cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I would be furious if the hot plate turned off after 30 minutes lol I thought I had it bad with my coffee pot at work turning off after 2 hours.

    Try and find the wiring that connects to the hot plate itself and then work backwards from there

  • B-TR3E@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It certainly isn’t on the second PCB. That’s the power supply and I’d definitely keep my hands off that. YOur best chance is to look for an IC with “555” in its’ type number. That’s the most commonly used timer chip. Search the net for a data sheet for the specific type and find the right pin to ground. It should be the one to start the timer; depending on the way the timeout is implemented it might also be the “set” pin.

    • northernscrub@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I suspect that the IC is the eight-pin thing I saw in the top left. It appears to be the only one there tbh, but it has a coating over it to hide the labeling for some inane reason. Bah.