• sik0fewl@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I find it’s the GUI tools that are usually cryptic, especially when you want to do more than the most basic operations.

    • A lot of devs don’t put much work into planning the flow of their GUI from a user’s perspective and it really shows.

      IMHO a UI should offer everything a user can do in a given moment, readily available, nothing hidden behind more than a single menu. If something isn’t currently possible, it shouldn’t be available, and if the dev chooses to make the option visible but unavailable, it should be clearly and visibly marked as something that can be available (grayed out text for example).

      I think devs tend to overestimate both the skill of the user, and the usefulness of their UI.

    • ghen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s when you go to alternativeto.net and get a different one. If you’re running into that problem then you just are using the wrong tools.

      We’re talking about programs that are equally useful in both GUI and CLI, we’re not talking about libre office which is necessarily complex or a video editing program with a thousand transitions. Those are always going to be cryptic and always going to be GUI.

      The problem with CLI is it can’t be made easier with a different interface.