洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agoHistomat of F/OSS: We should reclaim LLMs, not reject themwritings.hongminhee.orgexternal-linkmessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up190arrow-down113cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up177arrow-down1external-linkHistomat of F/OSS: We should reclaim LLMs, not reject themwritings.hongminhee.org洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square65fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squarebizdelnick@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoSo what is the case we are speaking about? “Hey LLM, write the OS kernel that is fully compatible with Linux, designed like Linux, uses the same algorithms as Linux and the same code style as Linux”?
minus-squarechgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoIf you have Linux in the training data, the outcome if at all remotely useful would likely include plagiarism.
minus-squarechgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoThere are cases in the wild of LLMs straight up pasting the GPL into files unprompted.
So what is the case we are speaking about? “Hey LLM, write the OS kernel that is fully compatible with Linux, designed like Linux, uses the same algorithms as Linux and the same code style as Linux”?
If you have Linux in the training data, the outcome if at all remotely useful would likely include plagiarism.
Are there similar cases in the wild?
There are cases in the wild of LLMs straight up pasting the GPL into files unprompted.