• CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Are you afraid to provide any reference to your claim? Do you need extra time making up stuff?

    No. Just calling out your double standard. If you didn’t provide sources for your statements, then it’s rich for you to demand sources from me.

    https://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-not-windows-why-munich-is-shifting-back-from-microsoft-to-open-source-again/

    https://youtu.be/XBRh2G29NNE

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiMux

    “In May 2020, it was reported that the newly elected politicians in Munich, while not going back to the original plan of migrating to LiMux wholesale, will prefer Free Software for future endeavours.”

    There are no official numbers, but the rollback to Windows was halted. It’s estimated that it’s currently a mix of Linux and Windows. And it’s been acknowledged that the move back to Windows was almost entirely political due to influence from Microsoft.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      “In May 2020, it was reported that the newly elected politicians in Munich, while not going back to the original plan of migrating to LiMux wholesale, will prefer Free Software for future endeavours.”

      So you lied. You claimed that Munich said “Hell no” to Microsoft Migration but here you spell it out yourself: The politicians did sell out to Microsoft and only newly elected politicians partially reversed it.

      They use Windows and MS Office on desktops to this day and use Linux on servers and some FOSS tools ON WINDOWS DESKTOPS.

      I was right, you lied.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They use Windows and MS Office on desktops to this day and use Linux on servers and some FOSS tools ON WINDOWS DESKTOPS.

        Citation needed.

        I know for a fact that there are no official numbers, and it’s estimated to be a split between the two OSes.

        You claimed that Munich said “Hell no” to Microsoft Migration but here you spell it out yourself: The politicians did sell out to Microsoft and only newly elected politicians partially reversed it.

        Ya, I’m not sure which part confuses you, but I’ll try to help:

        • Politician A sells out to MS

        • Migration back to Windows begins

        • Politician B gets elected

        • Politician B says “hell no” (hyperbole) to Microsoft switch back

        • Politician B halts the migration

        Still confused? Then I can’t help you.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 seconds ago

          Citation needed.

          I already provided one: https://lemmy.world/comment/21796829

          Cannot read a German news article about German news? Your problem. I’m 100% correct.

          Politician A sells out to MS

          The previous administration did.

          Migration back to Windows begins

          Which the previous administration did do and the new administration did not reverse on desktops. Windows and MS Office remain in use.

          Politician B says “hell no” (hyperbole) to Microsoft switch back

          There was no “hell no”. They adopted a few FOSS tools on Windows. Windows and MS Office remain in use. I already provided a source from June 2025, so quite recent.

          Politician B halts the migration

          You clamed there was no Microsoft migration. You claimed that any sort of Migrosoft migration is garbage misinformation. You’re a blatant liar.