• Nacktmull@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    More or less directly for the nuclear lobby I would assume. Or did I somehow misinterpret your question?

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I could see the fossil fuel lobby funding this, I’m not sure the nuclear lobby exists given how unprofitable it is.

      • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It is not unprofitable for the corporations who run the plants but only for society as a whole. You have to consider the state funding for research and development, subsidies for construction and operation of power plants, plus the fact that the state runs and pays for the final storage facilities for nuclear waste. All those billions of taxpayer money getting systematically redistributed to the nuclear industry to offset the real expenses of nuklear power, makes it in fact an extremely profitable business. Think about it, otherwise there would never have been a nuclear industry in the first place, at least in western/capitalist economies.