very_well_lost@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoDuckDuckGo poll says 90% responders don't want AIwww.pcworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square215fedilinkarrow-up11.49Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.47Karrow-down1external-linkDuckDuckGo poll says 90% responders don't want AIwww.pcworld.comvery_well_lost@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square215fedilink
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·6 hours agoOkay, so that’s not what the article says. It says that 90% of respondents don’t want AI search. Moreover, the article goes into detail about how DuckDuckGo is still going to implement AI anyway. Seriously, titles in subs like this need better moderation. The title was clearly engineered to generate clicks and drive engagement. That is not how journalism should function.
minus-squareLobsterJim@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 hours agoUnless I’m mistaken this title is generated to match the title at the link. Are you saying the mods should update titles to accurately reflect the content of the articles posted?
minus-squareTom Arrr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoAlso, Duck Duck Go is a search engine. What other ai would it do?
Okay, so that’s not what the article says. It says that 90% of respondents don’t want AI search.
Moreover, the article goes into detail about how DuckDuckGo is still going to implement AI anyway.
Seriously, titles in subs like this need better moderation.
The title was clearly engineered to generate clicks and drive engagement. That is not how journalism should function.
Unless I’m mistaken this title is generated to match the title at the link. Are you saying the mods should update titles to accurately reflect the content of the articles posted?
Also, Duck Duck Go is a search engine. What other ai would it do?