• infeeeee@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      How I understand it, they wouldn’t have to release it if they do it correctly. ODbL allows some mixing with proprietary sources, as listed here: https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Horizontal_Map_Layers_-_Guideline

      The principle that a map maker can make and publish a map made from several distinct horizontal layers without being obliged to share data from the non-OpenStreetMap layers has been established for several years and is much clearer with the switch to the ODbL. Here we formalise and state what we are happy with and give examples that we hope will help potential OpenStreetMap users with incompatible sources.

      https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines

      • Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They have definitely taken my edits on osm and added to Google maps. Some farm buildings got demolished and housing built on the spot. I was the one who added the buildings in the first place then removed then as they got demolished, then added roads new outlines etc. Google has the road going through the farm building. On the licencing front I’ve got no idea

        • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          should we add fake roads to osm to see if Boogle will add them (like paper map publishers used to do) ?

            • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              thanks for the link

              Does OSM have copyright easter eggs?
              Although some OSMers have deliberately added errors to the OSM data as well (see posting on legal-talk by User:80n), this is strictly discouraged and contrary to OSM policy. It’s also very unnecessary. Even if we seek to represent reality perfectly, that will never be the reality of map data. With OpenStreetMap there’s a very unique and distinct fingerprint evident in the data coverage and details included, and yes, in the errors made. For example in 2012 the OpenStreetMap foundation could issue a statement with absolute confidence that Apple had used our maps (without crediting us) based on very evident copying, and without the need for introduced errors.