- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Scientists investigating video of a cow using tools, and later conducting some basic psychology experiments on said cow, say their findings could expand the list of animals capable of tool use.


As I said, perhaps this is surprising only because we understand brains overly mechanically. As if it’s assumed that there’s a hard “can/can’t do” switch for particular mental actions, while in reality any ability may be a result of various factors within the individual brain and outside of it aligning together (including, of course, the cow in question being a pet, so having a very comfortable lifestyle). If people can vary wildly in their mental abilities and inclinations, why wouldn’t animals?
I guess I don’t understand what you mean then, especially the first sentence. I think there’s a pretty broad agreement that we have a very limited understanding of how brains work, and that our current benchmarks of sophistication (tool use being one) aren’t the last word on brain capabilities, they’re just (relatively) easily defined behaviors that we can use to categorize what abilities different animals have at their disposal to survive. You also can’t really demonstrate that an animal (or a species) can’t use a tool, you can only know if an animal can use tools by observing tool use, which we have now done with at least one cow. Which is pretty cool.