Epstein Files Jan 30, 2026

Data hoarders on reddit have been hard at work archiving the latest Epstein Files release from the U.S. Department of Justice. Below is a compilation of their work with download links.

Please seed all torrent files to distribute and preserve this data.

Ref: https://old.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/1qrk3qk/epstein_files_datasets_9_10_11_300_gb_lets_keep/

Epstein Files Data Sets 1-8: INTERNET ARCHIVE LINK

Epstein Files Data Set 1 (2.47 GB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 2 (631.6 MB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 3 (599.4 MB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 4 (358.4 MB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 5: (61.5 MB) TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 6 (53.0 MB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 7 (98.2 MB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 8 (10.67 GB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK


Epstein Files Data Set 9 (Incomplete). Only contains 49 GB of 180 GB. Multiple reports of cutoff from DOJ server at offset 48995762176.

ORIGINAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LINK

  • TORRENT MAGNET LINK (removed due to reports of CSAM)

/u/susadmin’s More Complete Data Set 9 (96.25 GB)
De-duplicated merger of (45.63 GB + 86.74 GB) versions

  • TORRENT MAGNET LINK (removed due to reports of CSAM)

Epstein Files Data Set 10 (78.64GB)

ORIGINAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LINK

  • TORRENT MAGNET LINK (removed due to reports of CSAM)
  • INTERNET ARCHIVE FOLDER (removed due to reports of CSAM)
  • INTERNET ARCHIVE DIRECT LINK (removed due to reports of CSAM)

Epstein Files Data Set 11 (25.55GB)

ORIGINAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LINK

SHA1: 574950c0f86765e897268834ac6ef38b370cad2a


Epstein Files Data Set 12 (114.1 MB)

ORIGINAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LINK

SHA1: 20f804ab55687c957fd249cd0d417d5fe7438281
MD5: b1206186332bb1af021e86d68468f9fe
SHA256: b5314b7efca98e25d8b35e4b7fac3ebb3ca2e6cfd0937aa2300ca8b71543bbe2


This list will be edited as more data becomes available, particularly with regard to Data Set 9 (EDIT: NOT ANYMORE)


EDIT [2026-02-02]: After being made aware of potential CSAM in the original Data Set 9 releases and seeing confirmation in the New York Times, I will no longer support any effort to maintain links to archives of it. There is suspicion of CSAM in Data Set 10 as well. I am removing links to both archives.

Some in this thread may be upset by this action. It is right to be distrustful of a government that has not shown signs of integrity. However, I do trust journalists who hold the government accountable.

I am abandoning this project and removing any links to content that commenters here and on reddit have suggested may contain CSAM.

Ref 1: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/nude-photos-epstein-files.html
Ref 2: https://www.404media.co/doj-released-unredacted-nude-images-in-epstein-files

  • DigitalForensick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    So what’s the consensus on what to do about all the fully uncensored CSAM the DOJ released on the 30th? Much of it has been removed as of today, but that shit is still fully up on archive.org… 🙄…Not Great…

    • Wild_Cow_5769@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      My two cents I have nothing but daughter…all my children are just daughters…

      We don’t take care of this weird sexual abuse problem now between authority, figures and other things like that. We never will…

      I don’t think I could sleep at night if I didn’t do my due diligence because someday time will just move on and all of us will be too old to do something about it…

      We either take care if this now or we never will as a society …

      You think about it do you ever think there will be another point in the future to root out this kind of evil?

      So I say release the files and let the chips fall where they fall but that’s just my two cents…

      Would be one thing if this entire process felt like we could really trust justice to do the right thing…

      Just look over there in the Epstein form on Reddit. They are all kinds of pictures and names of really really wealthy people that can just easily buy their way out of trouble…

      • DigitalForensick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hey that makes sense to me man.

        I think there will be plenty of falling chips in the coming weeks. Once the data is aggregated and truly accessible searchable… someone is going to make some AI something that can connect the dots faster than the justice system - because my god is it slow as molasses.

        I’m so tired of waiting around.

    • BWint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s “great” that the DOJ removed CSAM at the same time as they were removing perfectly legitimate files that are in the public interest. That’s just really smart. Puts us all in a hell of a bind.

      I can’t speak for others, but I’ll plan to preserve the 87GB Set 9, the 90GB Set 9, and Set 10, until we can get an updated “complete” (current) Set 9 that can be presumed to be free of CSAM. After that, we can try to identify the legitimate files that are missing from the “complete” Set 9, and preserve those while purging the CSAM.

      • DigitalForensick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        This seems like a valid plan - although I’m not that confident in the ‘purge’. It might be good to redact those images ourselves and then nobody is pressed to store them. Better to have a confidently safe dataset that can be passed around safely.

        Also, It looks like they went back and repaired the shitty text redactions on docs that were released late 2025 from what I can tell. I ran a script that auto detects and removes “fake” redactions and its not getting any hits anymore. even on files that it flagged in the past. They are definitely trying to cover their tracts* by the day*

      • DigitalForensick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Without a timestamp on the photo its impossible to be 100% but it was obvious enough for me to ask the question. :/ It seems like it was a mistake on their part because everything else has heavily redacted nudity. You can also see references in the internal memo docs preceding the content.

        • Wild_Cow_5769@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s a lawsuit to try to have a judge give an injunction to the file release. There isn’t a lot of time left…

          Once those files go away, do you honestly think anybody who will ever get to see them again?