Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 小时前1st Feb is #GlobalSwitchDaymedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square180fedilinkarrow-up1459arrow-down127file-text
arrow-up1432arrow-down1image1st Feb is #GlobalSwitchDaymedia.piefed.socialEk-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 小时前message-square180fedilinkfile-text
minus-square1984@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-22 小时前No. But mainly because content creators are on YouTube to get audience and a small profit. The technology is fine otherwise.
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 小时前This is an interesting economics problem. How can a p2p FOSS alternative compete with advertising revenue? The YouTube creators don’t even get most of the money, so it wouldn’t need to be perfect to be better.
minus-squarebaitu@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·42 分钟前Yeah I think it’s doable since most of the revenues are through sponsorship and you can evaluate the audience with likes and subscriptions
No.
But mainly because content creators are on YouTube to get audience and a small profit. The technology is fine otherwise.
deleted by creator
This is an interesting economics problem. How can a p2p FOSS alternative compete with advertising revenue? The YouTube creators don’t even get most of the money, so it wouldn’t need to be perfect to be better.
Yeah I think it’s doable since most of the revenues are through sponsorship and you can evaluate the audience with likes and subscriptions