I distro hopped for a bit before finally settling in Debian (because Debian was always mentioned as a distro good for servers, or stable machines that are ok with outdated software)

And while I get that Debian does have software that isn’t as up to date, I’ve never felt that the software was that outdated. Before landing on Debian, I always ran into small hiccups that caused me issues as a new Linux user - but when I finally switched over to Debian, everything just worked! Especially now with Debian 13.

So my question is: why does Debian always get dismissed as inferior for everyday drivers, and instead mint, Ubuntu, or even Zorin get recommended? Is there something I am missing, or does it really just come down to people not wanting software that isn’t “cutting edge” release?

  • enterpries@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 小时前

    As much as I’d like to recommend Debian, its release cycle really leaves a lot to be desired for pragmatic computer users.

    Bugs stick around for years, and with each new release you get new bugs that won’t be fixed for years.

    It could be better if the ecosystem had more support, but as it stands right now there are just better options for the desktop space.

    It’s fine for servers because they have the resources to make sure server programs aren’t a buggy or featureless mess.