You must log in or register to comment.
Our infrastructure? One server. One docker-compose.yml file. Zero Kubernetes complexity.
If your business/use case can tolerate manually rebuilding a server and redeploying your stack in case of hardware failure, I don’t see why we’re even discussing kubernetes.
That’s a cool docker compose setup and is definitely competitive with a single node k8s deployment I run for hobby projects (k3s). The simplicity of this docker compose setup is an advantage, but it is missing some useful features compared to k8s:
- No Let’s Encrypt support for Nginx using Cert Manager.
- No git ops support, the deployment shell script is manually run.
- No management ui’s like Lens or k9s.
- Will not scale to multiple machines without changing the technology to k8s or Nomad.
That said, I would be happy to run their setup if I hadn’t gone through the pain of learning k8s.
Ok? But it’s also more fun. Do whatever you want, I’ll stick with k8s
Removed by mod



