Both could be called a study of reality. But via very different methods.

  • SenK@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Op’s analogy isn’t about verifying meditation experiences as scientific facts, but about how both Zen and science are rigorous, disciplined studies of reality, just through different lenses. Zen isn’t about abstraction or quantification; it’s about direct, unmediated experience (and “peer review” happens with sangha and the teacher). The comparison is poetic, not literal. It’s kinda highlighting that both paths require clarity, humility, and a willingness to see things as they are, not as we wish them to be.

    • Blurntout@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Thank you for your response 🙏 it was enlightening my next quandary into zen meditation will take longer than 3 minutes 😅 sometimes in my observation of how things are I lack the perspective to grasp the poetry presented but it’s always a pleasant feeling having your eyes opened to it!

      • SenK@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Welcome ☺️ if you’re really interested, I frankly recommend trying meditation rather than try to understand the theory. The Way App from Henry Shukman is pretty good.