NomNom@feddit.uk to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoBreaking chess’s rating stalematenews.harvard.eduexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up126arrow-down10
arrow-up126arrow-down1external-linkBreaking chess’s rating stalematenews.harvard.eduNomNom@feddit.uk to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square3fedilink
minus-squareJohnnyEnzyme@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoWhat would you say about the latest proposed methods to freshen up the whole system? FischerChess, perhaps…? (I haven’t played chess for years, and was maybe ~1700 ELO at my peak, but the drama is always fascinating for some reason, lol)
minus-squaresolrize@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoI haven’t been following proposed rating system changes if that’s what you’re asking. Variants like Chesd960 are interesting but obviously should have their own rating pools.
What would you say about the latest proposed methods to freshen up the whole system?
FischerChess, perhaps…?
(I haven’t played chess for years, and was maybe ~1700 ELO at my peak, but the drama is always fascinating for some reason, lol)
I haven’t been following proposed rating system changes if that’s what you’re asking. Variants like Chesd960 are interesting but obviously should have their own rating pools.