(If you know where I stole this from, I love you.)

  • Scrollone@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yeah I agree. GNOME 3 is hideous, completely unusable. I don’t know why they had to ruin the perfection of GNOME 2.

    • Limerance@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I also liked GNOME 2 a lot. Current GNOME is okay for what it is, but it feels too dumbed down for my tastes. For example the default editor has basically no features compared to gedit back in the day. The desktop is kind of nice on a laptop with a good touchpad and gestures though.

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It was developed and released during a time where people obsessed with touch interfaces thanks to deficient computing devices like phones and tablets. So many people were wholly convinced that these things were going to completely replace general purpose computing, so projects like Gnome, which were being run by Red Hat, had to follow along one way or another, though they probably did so willingly.

      In any case, I am SO glad those days are over. It was far, far worse than the AI hype that we have to put up with today.

    • pot_belly_mole@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You have a right to that opinion but Gnome 4(0) was released a year and a half ago, and we’re on 49 now. Also, I think it’s beautiful and elegant.