• ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The sales of the glasses have been better than their VR headset which has really made them double down on the glasses as they see big potential. That said, I really think that it is a false hope as I suspect the market that is ok wearing Facebook glasses are small, but loyal.

    • PokerChips@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      These things should not be protected property. If you assault my privacy, I should be allowed to attack back.

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Most countries it’s legal to record in public, as there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy. Though these are a bit different than say someone with a phone or camera, as unless you pay close attention the glasses are easy to miss…

            • Kissaki@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 minutes ago

              I’m not the original commenter, but in Germany, you can record in public, but can not record individuals specifically. People walking past in the background while you record something else is fine. Recording someone specifically is not.

              That’s the baseline, at least. Exceptions may apply (public figures, public interest, etc).

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_rights#Germany

              A succinct statement of the German law can be found in the following judicial statement from the Marlene Dietrich case: the general right of personality has been recognised in the case law of the German Federal Court of Justice since 1954 as a basic right constitutionally guaranteed by Articles 1 and 2 of the Basic Law and at the same time as an “other right” protected in civil law under § 823 (1) of the BGB (established case law since BGHZ 13, 334, 338—readers’ letters). It guarantees as against all the world the protection of human dignity and the right to free development of the personality. Special forms of manifestation of the general right of personality are the right to one’s own picture (§§ 22 ff. of the KUG [de]) and the right to one’s name (§ 12 of the BGB). They guarantee protection of the personality for the sphere regulated by them.

        • entwine@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I disagree. Secretly recording someone with a phone is much easier than doing it with one of these. It’s the same issue people had with Google Glass back in the day.

          I think the reason it feels creepier is because, if you’re talking with someone that’s wearing them, it feels like they’re sticking a camera in your face.

          But like I could turn on my phone camera, leave it sticking out of my pocket, and record everyone taking a piss in a public restroom with nobody noticing. If I tried to do that with glasses, I’d have to turn my head towards everyone’s cock, one at a time. The neck pain alone makes it not worth the effort.

          But to be clear, fuck Meta. These glasses should be banned for many other reasons.

          • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Agree with you for the most part.

            Though your example of a public toilet is a bit flawed, since there IS a reasonable expectation of privacy.

            Google Glass was waaaaaaaaaay more obvious.

            Where the meta ones are a little less so.

            Depending on lighting, and distance from the Glasshole, could be really hard to spot the Meta ones.

            • teft@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Agreed. My friend has a pair of the meta glasses and i didn’t even realize they were meta glasses until he told me. The camera isn’t very noticeable unless you know what you’re looking for.

    • Smaile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      yahknow, if it wern’t for the fact that i know they’re a scummy company, i’d try them.

        • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          … Spoiler for you, but Valve is a shitty company.

          Edit: whoosh the fanbois are out there! We don’t share the same value if you think it’s ok for 10 years old to become gambling addicts because of Valve’s practices.

          I deleted my Reddit account because it is increasingly becoming an echo chamber cesspool of extreme centrism. I was hoping Lemmy would be somehow better with people more prone to discuss. Ho, well

          • chasteinsect@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 minutes ago

            Maybe just maybe it’s because it’s not as black or white as you make it seem? Especially talking about a company that did so much for Linux and looking at what their competition is doing…

          • lobut@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 minutes ago

            I get why people like Valve so much (I like some of their services too) but there’s too much deification. It’s like “oh mighty Gabe!”. I get some of it was tongue-in-cheek a bit initially but it seems so many people take it seriously.

            They’re a company that provides some services I like but the gambling shit is bad especially when you see people on YT talking about how they were lured in when they young and how much money was lost and how many streamers were running scam companies. It’s not good.

          • entwine@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I agree with you, but I get where the rabid fanboyism is coming from. The lack of competition in tech due to a variety of bullshit reasons (mostly corruption, look what Biden’s FTC was trying to do compared to Trump 2’s mask-off approach) have people pissed off and angry at the monopolists. Valve just so happens to be the least-bad monopolist in tech, so people like them.

            People need to get competition-pilled, so they realize that Valve isn’t our savior, and are in fact part of the problem too. They might be considered “good” today, but that’s because our standards have never been so low.

            Things can be, and should be better.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ve seen some amazing POV footage from them, because the lens is actually in line with your eye level.

      So, a lot of the market would be people who would otherwise use a GoPro.