Apparently this will include Linux…

  • Archr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’d love for you to go into more detail on how this is surveillance since that seems to be your main concern.

    The law does not require providing IDs or face scans or any other identifiable information. There are clauses in the law limiting where the data gets sent to and that if data does need to be sent then it is the minimum that is necessary.

    The law only requires that an account holder “indicate[s] the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device”. Outside of the abstract the law not once mentions any type of verification that must happen.

    Also it’s a California law. It doesn’t affect anyone outside of Cali so if you are affected take it up with your os provider or fork your distro.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So the input is not verifiable? This will not work and sounds more that it’s not intended to do anything other than shift the Overton Window. California has a huge fascist issue in Silicon Valley.

      • Archr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The point isn’t to verify your age the point is to have the account holder (the parent) attest to the age of the user (their child). If the parent lies and it negatively impacts the child then the parent can be fined.

        It also penalizes apps that see the user’s age is in a lower bracket and still shows them sensitive content.

        There is a huge fascist issue everywhere in the US. SV is not special in that respect.