• firns@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I feel like the answer is 100% Godot. No one should be using Unity at this point lol

    I also feel like if you have to ask this question, then just use Godot. You’re likely not making anything that would require certain features from Unity anyways. Also, if you were so inclined and talented enough, you could try and add that feature to Godot yourself since it’s open source. It wouldn’t work the other way around.

    I haven’t used Godot since 4.0, I hear 4.6 is real nice!

  • klangcola@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Building on top of Unity is a massive risk as made evident by last year’s rug pull incident. And there’s nothing stopping them from trying again

  • sbird@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Aside from the benefits of open-source, I also find that Godot has a nicer workflow for me, with nodes and signals that make it really easy to make games. I also like that GDScript is very similar to Python (so it’s a lot simpler) while also having the option for explicit data types. The code editor is also built into the engine which is nice. The documentation for Godot is also excellent (it truly is really good), not to mention integrated into the engine as well!

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Godot is yours to control. You, and others, can change the engine and share those changes.

    Someone else controls what your copy of Unity does, and they want to get paid. They can alter the deal at any time. Spend year(s) investing while praying they do not alter the deal any further.

    There are other considerations one can discuss (what do you want to make, user prior coding experince, what jobs want these days) but if you value your software freedom it’s an easy question answered by looking at the software license. MIT > Proprietary.

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I haven’t used either one yet, but I already know that I would rather my projects be married to Godot than to Unity, even if that were to make development a bit harder. Open systems are far less likely to betray me in the future.

  • Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Unity has certainly more love from industry, probably more features. Said that, I’d go with godot, because Unity is privately owned and full of crap behaviors. Also there is an interesting advantage godot has - you are free to write .NET 10.0 code, it works. As opposed to Unity which still uses some ancient Mono runtime (somebody correct me if I’m wrong).

  • thericofactor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Would it be possible in Godot to create a multiplayer strategy game on iOS and Android? Anyone have resources to sync game states over the internet?

  • ExtraMedicated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I’m unfortunately stuck with unity for now unless I feel like throwing away a decade of work.

    • Maestro@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Sunk cost fallacy. You won’t need a decade to rebuild in Godot. You know exactly what you’re making. It’ll be waaay faster. Unity as a company has proven themselves to be untrustworthy. They will pull the rug out from under you when they get the chance.