- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The NASA Authorization Act of 2026 has been approved, and alongside a directive for NASA to establish a permanent Moon base, the legislation includes language extending the International Space Station to 2032.
The ISS project was set to end in 2030. In 2024, NASA awarded a contract to Elon Musk’s SpaceX to build a tug to de-orbit the outpost by 2030, assuming it lasts that long. By then the complex’s first module will have been in orbit for more than 30 years, and cracks have plagued the structure alongside hardware failures as the laboratory ages. One space agency insider observed that “it’s on its last legs.”
Then again, in a 2024 interview with The Register, ESA astronaut Andreas Mogensen said of the ISS: “I wouldn’t be surprised if we extended it a few years.”
NASA is to begin soliciting proposals for two commercial space stations immediately (Axiom Space and Vast spring to mind), but, mindful of a potential gap, lawmakers have also directed the agency to keep the ISS running for a few more years – certainly until at least one commercial station is launched and capable of taking over ISS operations.


Let me tell you what that really means. Congress had pockets filled with contractor cash and passed bill. Contractor makes a shady agreement with someone at the top of the program making major decisions at NASA who immediately retires afterwards, that disables the agency’s ability to perform at any useful capacity. The reason to outsiders will be based on some bullshit about intellectual property and data rights, but will make collaboration essentially impossible, and will be the cause of failure if it happens. It’s almost like I’ve seen this too many times.
Sometimes if only one contractor is involved, it’s not too bad. Get several primes together and now everyone is screwed because everything is a secret.