bdonvr@thelemmy.club to Linux Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoLutris maintainer: "I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not."github.comexternal-linkmessage-square279fedilinkarrow-up1703arrow-down128file-text
arrow-up1675arrow-down1external-linkLutris maintainer: "I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not."github.combdonvr@thelemmy.club to Linux Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square279fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down10·2 days agoAs the maintainer said, the commits with AI code were already specified. See one here. It was never a secret.
minus-squareNonononoki@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·2 days agoHe now removed the code authorship from Claude lmao
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoHence the past tense. I think it was pretty petty to do this.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoIt was my impression that the AI stuff only started with a relatively recent update
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agoMaybe, I don’t know much about this tool or their practices. I only meant that it was factual that they were mentioning which commits had AI generated code in them.
As the maintainer said, the commits with AI code were already specified. See one here. It was never a secret.
He now removed the code authorship from Claude lmao
Hence the past tense. I think it was pretty petty to do this.
It was my impression that the AI stuff only started with a relatively recent update
Maybe, I don’t know much about this tool or their practices. I only meant that it was factual that they were mentioning which commits had AI generated code in them.