Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 5 days agoWell that's a reviewlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1197arrow-down126
arrow-up1171arrow-down1imageWell that's a reviewlemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 5 days agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-square🦄🦄🦄@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up126arrow-down5·5 days agoGender affirming care for cis people seems to be accepted way more easily.
minus-squareOnomatopoeia@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34arrow-down1·5 days agoHahahahahaja No, no, this isn’t “accepted”, she has money.
minus-squareCarbonIceDragon@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up56arrow-down1·4 days agoI mean, it accepted in the sense that entire governments aren’t trying to forbid her from using public bathrooms over it.
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-23 days agoThat’s because she has money.
minus-squareEarthman_Jim@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoNope. You’re missing some key social dynamics in your assessment.
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-23 days ago Gender affirming care for ultra-rich. Fixed that for you.
Gender affirming care for cis people seems to be accepted way more easily.
Hahahahahaja
No, no, this isn’t “accepted”, she has money.
I mean, it accepted in the sense that entire governments aren’t trying to forbid her from using public bathrooms over it.
That’s because she has money.
Nope.
You’re missing some key social dynamics in your assessment.
Fixed that for you.