A law that the largest companies in the world already comply with, and that hundreds of small projects cannot comply with, is not a child safety law. It is a compliance moat. It raises the regulatory cost of providing an operating system just enough that only well-resourced corporations can afford to do it.
The enforcement mechanism is the point. AB 1043 does not need to result in a single fine to achieve its purpose. The mere existence of potential liability — $7,500 per affected child, enforced at the sole discretion of the Attorney General — creates legal risk for anyone distributing an operating system without the resources to build an age verification infrastructure. Most of these projects will respond by adding a disclaimer that their software is “not intended for use in California.” Some will simply stop distributing.
The law does not need to be enforced to work. It works by existing. It works by making small developers afraid. It works because the cost of defending against even a frivolous AG action exceeds the entire annual budget of most open-source projects. You do not need to swing a cudgel to get compliance. You just need to hold it where people can see it.
Ageless Linux exists because someone should hold it back.
Well done! 💪👏
We must stand united, stand our ground, protest, react, and turn the tables. The fuckers making these shitty hidden-purpose laws must be reminded that “democracy” means, literally, “the people rule”. The people: we.
Well done! 💪👏
We must stand united, stand our ground, protest, react, and turn the tables. The fuckers making these shitty hidden-purpose laws must be reminded that “democracy” means, literally, “the people rule”. The people: we.