• nonius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      It’s a CLI tool for interacting with remote repos and things like issues and PRs on GitHub.

  • jdr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Step one, uninstall garbage like Deno, VSCode, fucking GitHub CLI.

    • three@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      REEEEE someone is using their computer not how I would use it!

      lmfao arch users are such losers

      #debian #stable #roll on deez nuts

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Joke’s on you buddy, I’m using Trixie just like you!

    • JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I keep my install pretty clean, for a desktop machine. Though I use a heavier DE (KDE) so that brings a lot of dependencies. But I only install software via pacman/aur that I am familiar with and know I’ll use. If I want to futz with something new or just temporarily, I’ll do it via virtualization, flakpaks, nix packages, or app images.

      Point is, I try to keep the cruft to a minimum, but I find the meme holds true still.

      I use Artix BTW. For now anyway. But so far so good!

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This is not applicable to arch tho

      Each package is updated independently, you pull updates whenever you feel like it, be that monthly or every five minutes

    • Badabinski@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I mean, just use any stable distro and you can live that life. Arch is good for its own reasons precisely because it’s this way.

        • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah I mean, this is the benefit of the fragmentation. If you don’t want to update all the time, you just use a different distro. I know I do, I’ve run Linux for 21 years now and never once run Arch because I don’t want what it does, but we’re still on the same team, and the things they do benefit me nonetheless. There are drawbacks to the fragmentation, but this is one of the benefits.

        • luluberlue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Well… it is a feature… we are talking about Arch here, a bleeding edge distro meant to be continuously updated.

          Want to update once every couple of decades? Go pick something stable like Debian (also Linux BTW).

        • mack123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          As a rescent convert coming from Ubuntu to cachy os, the update cadence of an arch ibased distro, is something to get used to. It is also one of the main reasons behind experimenting with it. I am.using ubutntu and debian for work related workloads, where stabiloty is more important than having.the latest software. For personal use and playing around, cachy has been awesome. You control your own cadence.with updates. I am doing weekly at the moment, or whenever I need some new piece of software.

        • bus_factor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Funny because it’s true? If you want updates all the time, install Arch. If you want as few updates as possible, pick some LTS distro.