IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Crazy Fucking Videos@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day ago[Video] British journalist Steve Sweeney bombed by Israel while reporting in Lebanoni.imgur.comvideomessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up1507arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1500arrow-down1video[Video] British journalist Steve Sweeney bombed by Israel while reporting in Lebanoni.imgur.comIndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Crazy Fucking Videos@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square129fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down3·21 hours agoWhat news source, pray tell, is not propaganda?
minus-squarefallaciousBasis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·10 hours agoThe best today are a short list of YouTube channels. Truly independent investigative journalists are a rare treasure these days.
minus-squareIchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down13·21 hours agoThere are many that don’t exist exclusively to push the narrative their owners want to get out there, don’t be so obtuse.
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·edit-221 hours agoThat claim is ridiculous. Name a single media source that does not slavishly serve the political context it arises from
minus-squareIchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down13·21 hours agoAP, Reuters, BBC World Service. There’s three.
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down4·19 hours agoAnd you think all three of those are meaningfully independent from the anglo-american military/espionage cartel?
minus-squareIchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down6·18 hours agoYou’re the one making the claim. Please provide credible sources that prove that they’re compromised.
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·edit-217 hours agoIt could be argued that you are the one making the claim. Why is the default assumption that the sources are trustworthy until proven otherwise? Even if I accepted the burden of proof, what evidence of this would you accept? Do you think you can read about it in your favored Western sources?
minus-squareIchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down8·17 hours agoJust admit you can’t backup your claim.
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·edit-217 hours agoOk, if you insist on doing it the debatebro way Here’s the first 3 BBC examples from https://lemmy.ml/c/ManufacturingConsent (all posted within the last week) https://lemmy.ml/post/44591370 https://lemmy.ml/post/44591278 https://lemmy.ml/post/44503503 Inb4 “those don’t prove anything” Yes, I asked you what evidence you would accept so will you answer that now? Do you see now why that’s actually the interesting question?
What news source, pray tell, is not propaganda?
The best today are a short list of YouTube channels. Truly independent investigative journalists are a rare treasure these days.
This, I agree with
There are many that don’t exist exclusively to push the narrative their owners want to get out there, don’t be so obtuse.
That claim is ridiculous. Name a single media source that does not slavishly serve the political context it arises from
AP, Reuters, BBC World Service.
There’s three.
And you think all three of those are meaningfully independent from the anglo-american military/espionage cartel?
You’re the one making the claim. Please provide credible sources that prove that they’re compromised.
It could be argued that you are the one making the claim. Why is the default assumption that the sources are trustworthy until proven otherwise?
Even if I accepted the burden of proof, what evidence of this would you accept?
Do you think you can read about it in your favored Western sources?
Just admit you can’t backup your claim.
Ok, if you insist on doing it the debatebro way
Here’s the first 3 BBC examples from https://lemmy.ml/c/ManufacturingConsent (all posted within the last week)
Inb4 “those don’t prove anything”
Yes, I asked you what evidence you would accept so will you answer that now?
Do you see now why that’s actually the interesting question?