Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoWhat would you change?media.piefed.socialimagemessage-square162fedilinkarrow-up1303arrow-down130
arrow-up1273arrow-down1imageWhat would you change?media.piefed.socialEk-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square162fedilink
minus-squareLian Dynn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·9 hours agoFedora isn’t based ln RHEL, it was before, but now it’s in fact the opposite. As far as I know, RHEL 10 is based on CentOS Stream 10, which in turn is based on Fedora 41.
minus-squareFlexibleToast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 hours agoThat’s correct. The community threw a fit when CentOS moved into that Stream position. Despite it being ABI compatible with RHEL.
minus-squareItdidnttrickledown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 hours agoI didn’t throw a fit I just replaced it within two months with debian and life goes on.
minus-squareFlexibleToast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoCongrats? Enjoy your totally different ecosystem and lack of SELinux.
minus-squareItdidnttrickledown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 minutes agoSomehow I’ve managed to get through okay. It might have something to do with competence.
Fedora isn’t based ln RHEL, it was before, but now it’s in fact the opposite. As far as I know, RHEL 10 is based on CentOS Stream 10, which in turn is based on Fedora 41.
That’s correct. The community threw a fit when CentOS moved into that Stream position. Despite it being ABI compatible with RHEL.
I didn’t throw a fit I just replaced it within two months with debian and life goes on.
Congrats? Enjoy your totally different ecosystem and lack of SELinux.
Somehow I’ve managed to get through okay. It might have something to do with competence.