The latest changes implemented in the Systemd repo, related to or prompted by age-verification laws, have made many people unhappy (I suppose links about this aren’t necessary). This has led to a surge in Systemd forks during the last days (“surge” because there have always been plenty of forks). Here are some forks that explicitly mention those changes as their reason for forking (rough time ordering taken from the fork page):

Hopefully the energy of this reaction won’t be scattered among too many alternatives, although some amount of scattering is always good.

  • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    This is a stupid reason to fork systemd, this is an optional features. I can think of totally reasonable use cases/situations where such an optional feature makes a lot of sense.

    Mind you, while I don’t have children, I have no intent to restrict their usage of the internet. Teaching them critical thinking and providing them a broad cultural exposure seems like a much more productive approach.

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Merging something so conflictive and blocking the revert make it look suspicious, more after knowing Meta have invested billions on gettinh age verification everywhere.

      Systemd has now vibed code and reviews, in the most critical process on most Linux machines. I see red flags.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I do think it would be better as a optional systemd add-on type of package, if such a thing exists.