Whales are tetrapods, which evolved from lobe-finned fishes, so cladistically they are fish. And so am I. Bloop bloop bloop!

    • early_riser@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had a whole deleted other paragraph in the OP about how everyday language isn’t beholden to strict scientific nomenclature, in which I mention tomatoes specifically. A chef probably doesn’t care about the exact botanical definition of “fruit”, and is more concerned that tomatoes pair well with savory foods like other vegetables do, so forcing the distinction in this case would only confuse things.

      I know I’m also undercutting my own joke, but calling whales (and humans) “fish” in the cladistic sense, while true, is also not very helpful.

      • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        As far as I’m concerned, culinary terminology will never override scientific definitions. The full phrase should be “tomatoes are used like a vegetable because of their relatively lower sugar content” rather than “tomatoes are vegetables”. To me it’s like someone living out of their car and calling it a house. Sure you live there and you do things in there that you would in a house, but that’s still a car at the end of the day.