• OR3X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The people saying “just pay for premium” don’t seem to understand that in the beginning YouTube was free and had no ads. When google purchased it they promised to keep it that way. Then they slowly started with ads. At first they were pretty unobtrusive banners, then a short skippable preroll then multiple preroll then unskippable preroll. The reason I refuse to pay for premium is because Google created this issue and is now selling the solution. I refuse to be a part of that. It has nothing to do with the creators.

    • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The cost of hosting YouTube itself doesn’t pay for itself unfortunately. They could get away with it back then because the internet itself wasn’t that big. Therefore, we need to KICK THE NORMIES OUT OF OUR INTERNET. WE WERE HERE FIRST, REEEEEE

    • Pman@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      ReVanced and Grayjay do the same thing but for free and are open source so long as Google keeps trying to engineer enshitification the proud people of the open source community will engineer a solution.

      • r3plic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Hmm weird take. Yes these are solutions to the Ad’s problem from the user side but they are just UI Wrapper for Youtube so they don’t have any costs for hosting & providing all the content. So yea they don’t need to monetize. This doesn’t however fix the problem for Youtube itself. How are they supposed to pay for cost & make a profit?

        I totally agree that Youtube with all the Ad’s is unusable (I’m using an AdBlocker) but Youtube is still a Profit orientated company so how do we fix this dilemma. Youtube Premium feels not worth it to most people because Youtube was always “free” so paying for it now makes people go like “WTF?”. So Ad’s & enshitification was/is the only way to make a profit for Youtube. I don’t like it either but this is reality.

        If you have a solution for them I’m sure they would pay you handsomely for it.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I would totally pay for youtube if it was even remotely decently priced.

      You can get multiple concurrents on disney+, Hulu or Netflix with blockbuster content for the same price as youtube’s slop filled premium family.

      Seriously, the service is worth maybe $9 a month. I don’t want their music, i won’t use it, the quality is crap.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I mean, as it grew the hosting/staffing costs went up as well. There’s no way it could have continued to be completely free.