: Flatpak may be next, and the lobbying behind it is raising eyebrows

Just what I want in my distro.

After weeks of debate, code to record user age was finally merged into the Linux world’s favorite system management daemon.

Pull request #40954 to the systemd project is titled “userdb: add birthDate field to JSON user records.” It’s a new function for the existing userdb service, which adds a field to hold the user’s date of birth:

Stores the user’s birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26-051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc.

The contents of the field will be protected from modification except by users with root privileges.

The change comes after the recent release of systemd 260 but unless it is reverted for some reason, it will be part of systemd 261. One of the justifications is to facilitate the new parental controls in Flatpak, which are still in the draft stage.

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    292·
    22 hours ago

    This was my reply in another thread about this bullshit:

    “It’s just a harmless field; what’s the big deal?”

    The big deal is that it’s on the heels of age verification bullshit that fascists are pushing through with the help of tech bros, so that they can eventually push all of us into a scenario where we have zero privacy.

    It’s not the adding of the field itself or the fact that it can be filled with nonsense. It’s the reasoning backing it.

    “But it’s the law!”

    Yeah, fucking and…? It’s a stupid mass surveillance law disguised as a protection, and per usual, it’s written like vague dog shit. This is the smallest part of the wedge. More will come of this and if developers like this keep volunteering themselves to help the fascists, we will all be fucked. Here’s an alternative approach: just don’t add this. You can fight back by not fucking implementing this. Easy.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      8·
      22 hours ago

      The big deal is that it’s on the heels of age verification bullshit that fascists are pushing through with the help of tech bros, so that they can eventually push all of us into a scenario where we have zero privacy.

      That’s a bit difficult to argue in a world where the most prominent of such laws was passed in California, where Democrats control the entire legislative process.

      I have not looked up the voting record for it, but would suspect that, like most of the worst laws in the US, it was enthusiastically supported by both parties? Am I wrong about that?

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        2·
        3 hours ago

        The Democratic Party as an apparatus is made up in large part by a bunch of neoliberal fascist-appeasers. Progressive are still a (growing) minority in the party. Leftists are nearly non-existent in it.

      • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOPEnglish
        10·
        18 hours ago

        From your instance, I’m guessing you have limited knowledge of the American political system. I don’t mean this as an insult; I couldn’t tell you a damn thing about CDU/CSU policies (AfD, of course, is easy to parse). The Democratic Party is just as captured as the Nazi one. It’s all corporate money, so the real difference between red states and blue states is politicians in blue states at least pretend to care for the working class.

        • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
          4·
          13 hours ago

          So you’re agreeing with me that this was supported by both parties…?

          (I’m actually Austrian, not German; I have however read enough about US politics that I’m fairly confident in my statement above.)

          • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOPEnglish
            2·
            4 hours ago

            Well, it’s not so much about parties but rather “donors” … which is to say, lobbyists who give not one whit whether there’s an R or D after the name if they can get what they want.

      • LukeZaz@beehaw.orgEnglish
        8·
        20 hours ago

        passed in California, where Democrats control the entire legislative process.

        I think that’s the “with the help of tech bros” part. Rather high population of those in California, and boy do they have lobbying money.