: Flatpak may be next, and the lobbying behind it is raising eyebrows

Just what I want in my distro.

After weeks of debate, code to record user age was finally merged into the Linux world’s favorite system management daemon.

Pull request #40954 to the systemd project is titled “userdb: add birthDate field to JSON user records.” It’s a new function for the existing userdb service, which adds a field to hold the user’s date of birth:

Stores the user’s birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26-051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc.

The contents of the field will be protected from modification except by users with root privileges.

The change comes after the recent release of systemd 260 but unless it is reverted for some reason, it will be part of systemd 261. One of the justifications is to facilitate the new parental controls in Flatpak, which are still in the draft stage.

  • Belazor@lemmy.zip
    1·
    11 hours ago

    If we accept the premise that certain distros will need to comply with age verification laws (school specific ones, distros running on govt machines), then it would be better if that information was securely stored in the system database rather than relying on each school/government agency reinventing the wheel.

    I will save my ire and save my effort protesting until age verification, not attestation, makes its way into my distro of choice.

    • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zipEnglish
      11·
      8 hours ago

      If we accept the premise

      Let’s not. They’re doing this backwards. If this were actually for the children, identification happens by the content, with the filters set locally.

      Not BROADCASTING TO THE ENTIRE INTERNET that a child is browsing.