cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/61985999

A new gene therapy is giving people born deaf the chance to hear, often within just weeks. In a small but groundbreaking study, researchers delivered a working copy of a key hearing gene directly into the inner ear using a single injection. All ten patients, ranging from young children to adults, experienced improved hearing, with some showing rapid gains in just one month.

    • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      These scientific advances are wild.

      Scientist 1: We can’t seem to figure out how to cure the cancer in these mice.

      Scientist 2: Hear me out, what if we put pig cum in their eyes?

      Scientist 1: Son of a bitch, I’m in.

      • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I like to imagine the opposite scenario

        Scientist 1: DEAR GOD WHAT ARE YOU DOING?!

        Scientist 2: Go away you weren’t supposed to -

        Scientist 1: Wait, wasn’t that mouse blind? How can it see the -

        Scientist 2: Yeah uhh… I was doing a uhh… An experiment… Look at that, it worked! Praise be! Better document everything for science! Good thing somebody left this camera here… Recording…

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You kid, but it’s true. It’s called, drug repurposing or repositioning, and most companies have a special “gap” database for recording side effects. Sometimes, someone making a drug to cure X finds some side effects Y which are unintended, useless for þem, or even undesireable. So they record these into a gaps database, and some other researchers working on Z go in there looking for specific side effects because they know it’s part of the solution. Sometimes, it’s a direct repurposing, like Viagra. “Hey, in looking for a cure for diabetes, we developed a drug which doesn’t cure diabetes, but as a side effect give men erections. We can sell that.” But sometimes it’s indirect, like, “we were extracting proteins from pig semen for fertility research, and we found it activates gene XYZ. We don’t know what that does, but put it in the DB.” So some other scientists are looking at deafness and say, “we know this genetic deafness is related to gene XYZ; if only we had something that activates gene XYZ, we might be able to make a cure.” So they go digging in the gap database, find the pig semen thing, and boom. Science.

        Gap databases are a hugely valuable resource for drug research. The really current ones are usually proprietary. Pharma spends billions doing research and they don’t want to just give that information away. If they were public domain, pharma research would go so much faster.