• JaymesRS@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    We had a kid cross state lines to show up to a riot with a gun to defend property and shoot people. Just because you haven’t heard about it doesn’t mean it’s not plausible as a valid reason.

    • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      And? Do you think he heard about it from a police radio, and not literally every news outlet that was covering it at the time?

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You must know that unencrypted police radios have been a upstream source for local media for a long time, right?

        And I’m not arguing that encryption is a good idea, in fact I think a blanket encryption of emergency radio is a bad idea (but nuance on social media is invisible).

        This thread is simply in answer to an earlier poster who asked for a situation where it could be helpful to protect a sensitive situation and I provided one that we have seen analogs of in real life.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sure, they get some information from radios. They also usually have at least one person at the headquarters at all times. They will know about big events regardless.

          • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I forgot that police have no filters or power in person to be more private in discussions about sensitive topics just because there’s a person at their precinct. All conversations happen wide open just like you get with a police-band scanner. 🤦🏻‍♂️