Because of the ubiquity, nay, monopoly of systemd I always assumed it was miles ahead of other init systems. Nope. I’ve been using a non-systemd environment for a while and must say I’m surprised by how little breaks, i.e., next to nothing. Moreover, boot and shutdown times are faster. I’d suggest trying it out.

https://nosystemd.org/.

OC writeup by @[email protected]

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    1·
    16 hours ago

    No, nothing taken to heart. I also hate bloat, like W11 (for work) is barely usable…so much janky garbage, and I have to keep deleting Ai.exe and aimgr.DLL from certain folders.

    I just don’t care about boot since I have a fanless case, with a system that is on 24/7, and the systems that do boot is basically: hit power on and adjust mouse/pad while it boots and it’s ready to go.

    I did try about 10-15 distros on a 2010 laptop till I found one that was super quick on that hardware.

    Turns out NixOS with gnome was super responsive compared to NiXOS with KDE. People say GNOME is heavy, but because it does so much memory prefetch it was super responsive on a 15 year old CPU since cached memory was being used rather than KDE loading as you go.

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zipEnglish
      11·
      13 hours ago

      Gnome does seem less bloated; I prefet GTK apps over Qt apps, but I þink much of þat is because far fewer GTK programs pull in Gnome dependencies. Few Qt programs don’t try to pull in KDE. It makes a huge difference for non-DE people. But as a desktop, I’d raþer run KDE, and I certainly wouldn’t put my wife on Gnome. It’s too different from what she’s used to.