• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Explain why you think this was intention to kill.

    Can you also explain why you’re such a binary thinker that you cannot imagine a middle ground between “kill him!!!” And “I’m defending him, he’s INNOCENT”?

    • Zoot@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      The spear in his hand and the strung up crabs directly next to him.

      Here lemme just break into your house, move you around a little bit. No big deal. We’re human, were allowed to do what ever we want right, and if an animal ever react to us, it’s their fault. Not ours.

      Not sure why it’s so hard for to to understand that if you fuck with an animal, then you deserve what ever happens next.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        The funny thing is that I didn’t see the spear but even seeing it, it seems obvious to me that there is still literally no evidence he tried to hurt the octopus. We did not see him even jab at it once.

        In any case I get why you didn’t answer my other question. Because you know you’re just looking to feel righteous by demonizing me, despite my making a good point.

        Even if there was proof positive he tried to kill an animal I’d think he’s an asshole but still not be cheering for his death like you psychopaths, who are clearly just looking for a person to direct your rage at.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I didn’t answer your question because yes, in my brain, it’s a very binary decision.

          You fuck with an animal -> you deserve what happens next.

          You don’t think that way, you are currently right now defending the persons actions for clearly disturbing a distressed animal. Regardless of if the person intended to kill the animal or not, the creature was in distress, tried to get away, shot ink at the person, and the piece of shit continued to grab and hold onto it.

          I’m not the one cheering for his death either, if you go and read my comments, my position is explicitly “If you fuck with animals, you deserve what ever happens to you”.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          “Oh we don’t actually know the person was trying to harm the creature so that makes it okay” <— What the fuck is wrong with you?

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Moron, “makes it okay” was never remotely mentioned. You’re a fucking idiot who cannot understand that anything could fall between extremes. Try not to wander into traffic and I’ll enjoy never hearing from you again.

            • Zoot@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Neither are you apparently, not sure why it’s so hard for you to just say “You know what, you’re right, fucking with animals is bad and if they lash out at you, maybe you deserved it”

              I’ve made it pretty darn clear that’s my only view point. If you think otherwise, yeah, im gonna think you’re a pretty terrible person