• BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Not yet, but wait until they’ve reduced their workforce by 75%, and they can save all those associated expenses.

    It won’t work, of course, but they’ve deluded themselves into believing it.

    • e461h@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Certainly part of the sales pitch. But so far it turns out humans are more efficient (cost less). I think the appeal to companies is the control (and the cost while it’s so heavily subsidized by the industry pushing it. The appeal to the major AI investors and execs is to… privatize the profits and socialize the losses. They will golden parachute themselves and leave the people with their mess.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The vast majority of the costs are HW and infra

      I think they’re hoping that reaches more of a steady state

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I think they’re hoping that reaches more of a steady state

        With how quickly tech advances and hardware degrades under heavy use, they’re going to be pushing that rock up a hill for a good while lol