• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Same thing my grand father says about EDM. Personally, if I can tap my feet to it, it’s music. I doubt you would be able to tell the difference in a blind test in any case.

    • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I don’t have a lot to give in this world. Despite working hard I’m not earning much, but I believe it’s important for each and every one of us to give a little of the little we have. So today I give you my downvote. Please take good care of it.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I don’t think it belongs on platforms like Deezer but it’s silly to not call it music.You can hate how it’s made but the bar for something to be music isn’t dependant on the fact. Downvote me I guess.

        • BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          18 hours ago

          If I steal someone else’s song and put my name on it nobody reasonable would say I made it.

          This whole AI-art fucktrain is entirely propped up by people who never made art before suddenly thinking they know something.

          • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            17 hours ago

            If I steal someone else’s song and put my name on it nobody reasonable would say I made it.

            People were saying the same thing about sampling in hip hop. Yeah if you do a 1 to 1 copy of a song then that’s not making art but if you take elements from a song and rearrange them then that is.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              And there have been a lot of discussions over the decades over artists/“aritists” who overly sampled a song and became orders of magnitude bigger than the original artist.

              Its a balancing act. Most people aren’t going to get too annoyed if someone uses generative AI to help build a backing track or a beat to go with their song.

              The issue is that so much of this slop is “make a song like this” from scratch. And while there is a lot to be said about manufactured acts and the role of major labels… one of the few good things about spotify et al destroying the music industry is that it has become so much easier for smaller independent artists to get a foothold.

              And all this does is add more slop to push them back out. And the difficulties with detecting slop will mean people will be a lot less likely to ever check out a smaller band when they can instead listen to whatever the latest major act that beyonce et al vouched for is.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            My issue is more about not calling it music. Imo, if it’s groovy and my brain enjoys it, it’s music.

            There’s some music I seriously don’t enjoy as well but I still consider it music because someone does.

            That being said, I don’t label AI stuff as “made”. I’m quick with making the distinction when sharing with friends and stuff. I agree with that part. Although it becomes blurry at times. Making something with samples is still making it, what about making it with AI generated samples? I don’t consider it stealing in any case, much too transformative imo.

            I think we should separate the platforms but I’m not sure where certain things should land. It’s all music for me though.

            • techt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Thanks for taking the time to explain yourself! I wanted to jump in to potentially clear up a difference of semantics, y’all are just using different interpretations of a phrase and I think it’s worth exploring.

              If I take the person you originally replied to and continue the thought on my own, I think “it shouldn’t be called music” is trying to express that “this content should be fundamentally distinct from music because it displaces artists who, as a group, are finding it increasingly hard to sustain themselves on their art alone”.

              If your relationship with music stops at something to tap your foot to, then you may or may not appreciate the value music has for society in the form of things like expression, protest, criticism, unity, and faith. Every time we listen to a bot-generated song, it takes a listen away from a human artist and pushes us toward a world eventually devoid of those artistic contributions.

              Whether or not it fits into the same musical category as human-generated media isn’t really the point worth talking about (it’s trained on that after all, of course it’s similar!). What we need is a way to keep it from displacing human-generated art, and I don’t think calling it music or not is enough.

        • Forsho@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          On the contrary that soulless shit belongs to garbage platforms that is killing the music industry.

          I am not debating with you what music means to me, please understand that MR. DJGPT