There’s always ways out, seems like a foolish and non-responsible thing to do. A window screen can get knocked out and the dogs gone, dogs can jump fences, training means nothing if a rabbit comes into view, just to mention a few off the top of my head.
Do you have a lock on your gate to prevent some neighbourhood kid from leaving it open?
It’s so cool how you can see all possible futures for every dog on earth. Dogtor Strange in the house. I am writhing with envy over here. In the off chance that you cannot do that, however, how’s about you step off and mind your own business?
You know there are real problems in the world, right? Like, issues that are actually affecting people? Do you write to your political representative with this much verve?
P.S. “I have to correct what I see as moral missteps of on-line strangers” is a silly stance.
A house can burn down, so you have a fire extinguisher.
Your dog can get out, so you have a collar onthem with identification, usually the municipal registration.
It’s about being responsible, if you’re not being responsible for your pet, that usually translates to other parts of your life too. Like not having an extinguisher, or other very simple and basic preventative things can do to minimize the unexpected.
It’s also kinda like car insurance, it’s great when it’s needed, but otherwise useless. We do lots of stuff like this already, you can do the same for your pet.
I now have more time to write stuff out, so I’m going to expand on my earlier comment. Also I want you to get another ping on this so you can see how silly I think you are.
if you’re not being responsible for your pet, that usually translates to other parts of your life too
If you cannot see how bonkers that statement is then you gotta take a class or something. Trying to cast judgment upon someone’s entire life based on one attribute is puritanical and a bit totalitarian.
I don’t know if anyone ever told you, but your singular idea of “responsible” is not universal. Different places on earth have different circumstances and therefore different laws/rules/practices around many things, pet ownership included. This is the internet. Sometimes called “The World Wide Web” (emphasis on World). There is a chance people in this thread are not in your local area. Don’t try to foist your ideals onto others like some sort of colonist.
I haven’t seen anyone advocating for bobbing tails, cropping ears, or breeding pug-like features. This collar “issue” y’all are getting so worked up on is incredibly minor. My unsolicited advice is for you to chill out and let other people decide for themselves what they think is best for their own dogs in their own homes.
P.S. If anyone sees an animal in actual duress (chained outside without food/water/shelter, physically abused, etc.) then please reach out to your local animal enforcement department (if available) and make a report. Arguing on the internet doesn’t fix anything.
Incredibly irresponsible, it’s so simple to do and keeps your animals safer if something happens. Not to mention if a burglar gets in or your house starts on fire.
It also gets your dogs used to it, and do your dogs a favor and walk it with a harness anyways. Walking them with a collar is just bad practice, hurts their necks at a minimum, it also leads to excessive lead pulling.
Let me worry about my own dogs, yeah? We do walk with a harness, putting on shoes (me) and collars (dogs) before we go out has been a literal routine for years, and they do always wear their collars when they’re new and in training for exactly the reasons you all are harping about. We even do emergency drills for things like tornado warnings where I say “danger, danger” and they know to head to the basement (where I keep backup collars + ID tags and vet records).
For fuck’s sake, it’s a cute dog meme and y’all are pouncing on one trivial line in the caption like I’m the worst animal abuser in the world for wanting my dogs to be comfortable around the house. There are too many miniscule-chance-of-that-ever-happening "what if"s to worry about that I’m not going to live my life in a safety bubble. The yard is fenced, we’re in suburbia, they’re both chipped, they’re both trained, they’re both socialized, the neighbors all know them, and we’re doing just fine thank you very much.
Geesh, the number of people around here who always have to be right is staggering and extremely off-putting.
I’m pretty shocked at the way you’ve been piled on for something so unimportant.
Most days, I hate the internet. This community us usually a nice antidote to all that (pictures of dogs!) but every now and again you get interactions like the one you’ve just experienced that make me just want to pack it all in.
I’m sorry this happened for you. You sound like a responsible and loving dog owner.
You can justify it all you want it’s just plainly being irresponsible, being a pet owner comes with responsibilities, like keeping them safe in worst case scenarios. It can be the same as being an abuser, you just don’t realize it until it’s too late and happened, but guess what. It’s preventable, don’t be that one. It would be abuse to not collar your dog and thatswhy it was lost or hurt. But defend this I guess.
Also your dogs not uncomfortable with it on, that’s pure BS, if it is, get a better one. Yeesh, of course something worn infrequently isn’t comfortable, same for humans. Wear a shirt too small, you’re gonna want it off too.
It’s also in case you dog gets out and hurts someone, so they can hold you accountable too, so yeah, your also not doing your public duty to protect them either.
You have no idea where OP lives, and what the requirements or relevant legislation are there.
You’re making a huge issue out of something that really isn’t one, and accusing OP of being irresponsible because they don’t do things exactly the way you do. This is bad faith and projection on your part.
You’ve invented hypothetical scenarios so you can accuse the OP of being irresponsible without having access to all facts.
OP has stated dogs are always collared when they’re taken out.
OP has stated dogs are secured at home.
You don’t know what area OP is in or if it requires microchipping.
If, in your invented scenario that OP’s dog escapes and causes damage, the dog isn’t caught, then what practical difference does it make whether the dog has a collar or not?
In the case of a microchipped dog without a collar, you just take it to any veterinarian or whatever your local equivalent of an animal control office is.
There are too many small-chance-of-that-ever-happening “what ifs” to worry about that I’m not going to live my life in a safety bubble.
I mean it’s something you don’t need to worry about if it’s always on them, and that’s also exactly why they are on them. It’s no different than having a fire extinguisher, I don’t plan on burning my house down, but its responsible to have it, and irresponsible (illegal in places too) to NOT have them.
I’m sorry you feel being a responsible pet owner is a burden. You’re also the one making a mountain out of a simple question, your link even agrees with it being irresponsible, so reap what you sow mate.
You’re also the one defending being a nonresponsible pet owner, so who’s the one fighting to be right…?
There’s always ways out, seems like a foolish and non-responsible thing to do. A window screen can get knocked out and the dogs gone, dogs can jump fences, training means nothing if a rabbit comes into view, just to mention a few off the top of my head.
Do you have a lock on your gate to prevent some neighbourhood kid from leaving it open?
Edit: Lol, responded to the wrong post cause I just woke up.
Being irresponsible is a perfectly valid reason for calling someone out lol. In fact, it’s the only way to correct the behavior usually.
It’s so cool how you can see all possible futures for every dog on earth. Dogtor Strange in the house. I am writhing with envy over here. In the off chance that you cannot do that, however, how’s about you step off and mind your own business?
You know there are real problems in the world, right? Like, issues that are actually affecting people? Do you write to your political representative with this much verve?
P.S. “I have to correct what I see as moral missteps of on-line strangers” is a silly stance.
You don’t have to.
A house can burn down, so you have a fire extinguisher. Your dog can get out, so you have a collar onthem with identification, usually the municipal registration.
It’s about being responsible, if you’re not being responsible for your pet, that usually translates to other parts of your life too. Like not having an extinguisher, or other very simple and basic preventative things can do to minimize the unexpected.
It’s also kinda like car insurance, it’s great when it’s needed, but otherwise useless. We do lots of stuff like this already, you can do the same for your pet.
I now have more time to write stuff out, so I’m going to expand on my earlier comment. Also I want you to get another ping on this so you can see how silly I think you are.
If you cannot see how bonkers that statement is then you gotta take a class or something. Trying to cast judgment upon someone’s entire life based on one attribute is puritanical and a bit totalitarian.
I don’t know if anyone ever told you, but your singular idea of “responsible” is not universal. Different places on earth have different circumstances and therefore different laws/rules/practices around many things, pet ownership included. This is the internet. Sometimes called “The World Wide Web” (emphasis on World). There is a chance people in this thread are not in your local area. Don’t try to foist your ideals onto others like some sort of colonist.
I haven’t seen anyone advocating for bobbing tails, cropping ears, or breeding pug-like features. This collar “issue” y’all are getting so worked up on is incredibly minor. My unsolicited advice is for you to chill out and let other people decide for themselves what they think is best for their own dogs in their own homes.
P.S. If anyone sees an animal in actual duress (chained outside without food/water/shelter, physically abused, etc.) then please reach out to your local animal enforcement department (if available) and make a report. Arguing on the internet doesn’t fix anything.
Lol, wanna read my palm too?
Incredibly irresponsible, it’s so simple to do and keeps your animals safer if something happens. Not to mention if a burglar gets in or your house starts on fire.
It also gets your dogs used to it, and do your dogs a favor and walk it with a harness anyways. Walking them with a collar is just bad practice, hurts their necks at a minimum, it also leads to excessive lead pulling.
Let me worry about my own dogs, yeah? We do walk with a harness, putting on shoes (me) and collars (dogs) before we go out has been a literal routine for years, and they do always wear their collars when they’re new and in training for exactly the reasons you all are harping about. We even do emergency drills for things like tornado warnings where I say “danger, danger” and they know to head to the basement (where I keep backup collars + ID tags and vet records).
For fuck’s sake, it’s a cute dog meme and y’all are pouncing on one trivial line in the caption like I’m the worst animal abuser in the world for wanting my dogs to be comfortable around the house. There are too many miniscule-chance-of-that-ever-happening "what if"s to worry about that I’m not going to live my life in a safety bubble. The yard is fenced, we’re in suburbia, they’re both chipped, they’re both trained, they’re both socialized, the neighbors all know them, and we’re doing just fine thank you very much.
Geesh, the number of people around here who always have to be right is staggering and extremely off-putting.
I’m pretty shocked at the way you’ve been piled on for something so unimportant.
Most days, I hate the internet. This community us usually a nice antidote to all that (pictures of dogs!) but every now and again you get interactions like the one you’ve just experienced that make me just want to pack it all in.
I’m sorry this happened for you. You sound like a responsible and loving dog owner.
You can justify it all you want it’s just plainly being irresponsible, being a pet owner comes with responsibilities, like keeping them safe in worst case scenarios. It can be the same as being an abuser, you just don’t realize it until it’s too late and happened, but guess what. It’s preventable, don’t be that one. It would be abuse to not collar your dog and thatswhy it was lost or hurt. But defend this I guess.
Also your dogs not uncomfortable with it on, that’s pure BS, if it is, get a better one. Yeesh, of course something worn infrequently isn’t comfortable, same for humans. Wear a shirt too small, you’re gonna want it off too.
It’s also in case you dog gets out and hurts someone, so they can hold you accountable too, so yeah, your also not doing your public duty to protect them either.
Dogs are almost always microchipped.
Anyone can scan a dog and see who its owner is.
You have to catch a dog to read the collar anyway.
You folks are being way too hyper critical.
Not mandatory.
Need a device, so no.
Yeah and?
No, it’s basic pet responsibility.
You have no idea where OP lives, and what the requirements or relevant legislation are there.
You’re making a huge issue out of something that really isn’t one, and accusing OP of being irresponsible because they don’t do things exactly the way you do. This is bad faith and projection on your part.
Please stop.
You don’t need to know where someone lives to know doing certain things are responsible or irresponsible.
Doesn’t matter what the legislation is, you should have visible identification on any animal that can get outside.
It’s your public responsibility incase it causes damage for one thing.
But thanks for coming in with the ad hominem.
You’ve invented hypothetical scenarios so you can accuse the OP of being irresponsible without having access to all facts.
OP has stated dogs are always collared when they’re taken out.
OP has stated dogs are secured at home.
You don’t know what area OP is in or if it requires microchipping.
If, in your invented scenario that OP’s dog escapes and causes damage, the dog isn’t caught, then what practical difference does it make whether the dog has a collar or not?
In the case of a microchipped dog without a collar, you just take it to any veterinarian or whatever your local equivalent of an animal control office is.
I mean it’s something you don’t need to worry about if it’s always on them, and that’s also exactly why they are on them. It’s no different than having a fire extinguisher, I don’t plan on burning my house down, but its responsible to have it, and irresponsible (illegal in places too) to NOT have them.
I’m sorry you feel being a responsible pet owner is a burden. You’re also the one making a mountain out of a simple question, your link even agrees with it being irresponsible, so reap what you sow mate.
You’re also the one defending being a nonresponsible pet owner, so who’s the one fighting to be right…?