• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    mostly self-driving

    Yeah I wouldn’t call that self driving.

    Here is a genuine question for you, how did the cost compare to an uber ride? Was it a fraction of it?

    Technological leaps have always provided huge reductions of cost, I do wonder how expensive robo taxis would be compared to regular ones

    • BenevolentOne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t think we’ll ever stop moving the goal posts. You can still meet people who don’t use computers and have never seen the use in them.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Moving the goal post? Self driving has the word self in it, if anything I’m insisting on keeping the goal post.

        • BenevolentOne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          There are 70 drivers for 3000 vehicles. Which goal is good enough for you? We’ll make a note, I’ll tell you when we passed it, and you can tell me why it’s not real. I’m willing to wait.

          • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I would have imagined self driving means 0 drivers

            It would also include all driving conditions

            For the record, I’m not saying that’s not impressive, I’m just going by the definition.

            I honestly thought we would have automated truck drivers by now, which imo is when shit really hits the fan.