I politely disagree. This is truly a humanitarian viewpoint worthy of deliberation beyond what could be discussed in an online forum.
Therefore no haste with this viewpoint. Perhaps a civilized discussion could be had without fleeing towards comforting conclusions and welcoming sideline discourse.
I truly wish there weren’t a need.
But for the love of Our Lord Almighty, may we be willing to listen and be as open minded & accepting with a sincerely open hearted view. However unfortunate, this resolution lay upon many/ and or some of us.
I do believe that this scenario demands an appropriate and very pragmatic approach.
That was merely a figure of speech.
I’ actually identify as an agnostic daoist. And no, that’s not AI. It was written by someone that tries to keep up their writing chops.
It is my viewpoint that’s all.
I politely disagree. This is truly a humanitarian viewpoint worthy of deliberation beyond what could be discussed in an online forum. Therefore no haste with this viewpoint. Perhaps a civilized discussion could be had without fleeing towards comforting conclusions and welcoming sideline discourse. I truly wish there weren’t a need. But for the love of Our Lord Almighty, may we be willing to listen and be as open minded & accepting with a sincerely open hearted view. However unfortunate, this resolution lay upon many/ and or some of us. I do believe that this scenario demands an appropriate and very pragmatic approach.
Appropriate and pragmatic, yes. The death penalty is neither.
Chat GPT should leave god of his well-formulated but robotic sounding responses. Politely.
Ok hotshot, what’s your personal take on the issue?
That was merely a figure of speech. I’ actually identify as an agnostic daoist. And no, that’s not AI. It was written by someone that tries to keep up their writing chops. It is my viewpoint that’s all.
deleted by creator