• sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I mean like I have a local LLM and essentially I use it as a coding assistant, but more accurately I’m doing a study of what kinds of errors these things produce more frequently and in which cases.

    Its essentially a hobby that sates my curioisty and occasionally produces semi complex, working code.

    … This is apparently, to MSFT, not only production ready, but ‘meta-production ready’.

    Oh well, it certainly is funny.

  • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Don’t worry, once GitHub CoPilot fixes the issue (that it rolled out directly into production), everything will be back to normal!

    • quantumvoid0@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 hours ago

      i wonder when their copilot will push code that breaks copilot , and then it just cycles into a infinite breakage

  • earthfm@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Sounds like an indexing issues. Should be fixed soon enough. (If not I return to copy pasting my code in notepad)

  • mortalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Real Questions, is there a competitor that offers the same feature set? Last I looked no one had anything to compete with github actions.

    • sbeak@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      GitLab exists and is used by many big corpos already, and Codeberg has its own version of Actions (woodpecker I think it’s called.)

      • guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Codeberg is based on the software Forgejo, just with some extra modifications. I’m running my own Forge instance and it’s absolutely great

        • Coolcoder360@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Can confirm, Forgejo also has actions that are compatible with github actions. I just started using that a little bit recently. Gitea does too. No reason to stay on github anymore.

          • quantumvoid0@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            my only reason is that big projects use github and so does majority of everyone. altho the switch to gitlab or codeberg is seen in many FOSS projects , it’s not 100% there yet… i recommend playing safe having accounts on all platforms for the time being

      • Sv443@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        The ecosystem. With GitHub you add 10 jobs with a single “using” line and be done with it, with GitLab you manually download 10 binaries, install them, then write scripts to use them, then ensure the binaries and their cache locations are properly cached, then run cleanup steps if you’re responsible.
        It’s a compromise even if its not a deal breaker.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          if you are downloading the tools in every pipeline run, you are doing it wrong, wasting resources and time. tools should be baked into a new docker image that you use in the pipeline. another pipeline updates the image on schedule

    • disorderly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Real answers: gitlab has awesome integrated CI, and you can always go for a remote integration if you prefer (e.g. self-hosted Jenkins, or a managed solution like circleci).