It wasn’t a lecture, nor was it a personal attack to you. Your comment didn’t anthropomorphize LLMs, so I’m not sure how you interpreted that as me coming at you. The only place we disagree on this topic based on what we’ve each commented so far is that misinformation is inherently a byproduct of how LLMs currently function.
You may not be as neutral on this topic as you claim if a response like mine felt offensive. It was a fairly predictable counter argument, and I’m not even the only one who made it in the replies.
It wasn’t a lecture, nor was it a personal attack to you. Your comment didn’t anthropomorphize LLMs, so I’m not sure how you interpreted that as me coming at you. The only place we disagree on this topic based on what we’ve each commented so far is that misinformation is inherently a byproduct of how LLMs currently function.
You may not be as neutral on this topic as you claim if a response like mine felt offensive. It was a fairly predictable counter argument, and I’m not even the only one who made it in the replies.
Well, you did reply to me. I didn’t realize you turned to the audience for the second paragraph