• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A report in Politico details a TED talk in Vancouver last month

    Oh so it’s just rambling musings of some self-important CEO rather than any actual declaration of intent.

    There are some good TED talks but a lot of them are just hot air.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      I feel like the bar is extremely low for TED talks these days. But maybe it has just changed to a financial one instead of an intellectual one.

  • Kommeavsted@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    We could be granting everyone in the world a high standard of living but instead we’re going to charge them to self-induce early onset neurodegenerative disease.

  • Delascas@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If by “for a while” you mean “until I’m dead” . . then yea, sure. Any other definition . . no chance in hell.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      It’s still just a report on things that Sam Altman and his ilk says, it has a much as much validity as Elon Musk claiming that we’re going to have cities on Mars by the end of next year. I’ve never been able to decide if these idiots actually believe the things they are spouting or if they’re just trying to get more investment but either way it’s not worth paying any actual attention to them.

      Assuming we’re even on the right path towards superhuman AI (personally I can’t see large language models actually leading anywhere) we’re certainly only at the start of that journey, it’s pointless to muse about what the end would look like because we have no idea what kind of technology will have by the end, it could be a century or more from now.

      Regardless the people deciding on that technology will be scientists not rich CEOs with over inflated salaries who can barely wire up a light switch, let alone design a brain implant.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Honestly they just say things. If you spend 30 seconds thinking about it it’s pretty obvious that no one’s going to get a brain implant. It’s a brain implant, it’s not something you casually decide on a whim.

      Also who’s doing it, the world isn’t exactly a wash with neurosurgeons let alone who would just eager to risk a potential lawsuit carrying out unnecessary brain surgery. Unless the plan is to get robots to do that, but surely we would need the robots before we start talking about the brain chips.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Just what everyone needs, the Internet of things wired into their brain. No problems with that ever. No sir. /s

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Just like we all ran out and bought 3D TVs. Right? And Meta smart glasses. Any day now!

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Over my dead body.

    Also, this is laughable:

    We’re on the cusp of the next major transition, the merger of humans and AI.

    These guys don’t even have true AI yet, just a text predictor on steroids that frequently hallucinates and gets things wrong.

    • Zanshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s because they’re in so much debt they need to run forward to outrun it by… Getting into even more debt on the basis that this time it will payoff

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The cope is really deep in the tech sector. Way too many imbeciles who think they’re geniuses and too much VC to throw around.

        • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It’s much worse now. Some of these people actually did impressive things earlier in the 21st century. Now they’re 90% grifters

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      AI is incredible if you ask it about stuff you’re not an expert on. Once you ask it those things you already have expert level knowledge on, especially nuanced questions, you’ll start to see the issues. It won’t be every question it gets wrong, but it’s often enough to be an issue.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        In other words, it’s all an illusion. It’s a ruse to get us to feed it our thoughts, so it can summarize our files and our queries, and it can feed us the responses it is told to feed us.

        We already know it can do that since they’re placing fucking ads in it.

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Let me put a chip in my brain that will run software developed by the lowest paid intern using claude 7. I dont trust big corp to update my phone and car, there is zero chance i trust them with my brain.

  • ViciousPanda37@forum.macaque.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No I wouldn’t trust them with something like that. Too many times they get us hooked on some technology, only to pull the rug later and jack up the prices, or enshittify the service.

  • Schwim Dandy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    15 hours ago

    AI CEO D. Scott Phoenix laid out a vision of a world in which the chipped enjoy so many advantages of the unchipped that you’ll be forced to comply.

    I won’t even verify my age online. He can shove my advantageous chip right up his ass.

    • Signtist@bookwyr.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m glad I learned that excessive convenience is a bad thing before this became the norm.

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      forced to comply.

      The language I’d expect from a villain in some fiction aimed at teenagers, not from a real person. This is so bizarre, and the amount of people ok with ceos saying those things is disturbing

    • foodandart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Doesn’t matter… we all know you’re a 47 year old used car salesman from Peoria.

      LOL!