• Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Revenue is not profit. I’m not defending them, but relating revenue to layoffs is apples and oranges.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Are people backwards here or something? You’re explicitly stating that you’re not defending them, and you’re completely right in what you’re saying. A company can have record revenues and record losses (negative profit) in the same period. That doesn’t mean meta and zucky are anything short of horrible, it means the headline is crap. An informative headline would be “<Company> reports <value> profits and announces <number of> layoffs”. Saying they have record revenues tells us exactly nothing about whether layoffs are justified or not.

      Case in point: My buddy’s startup had record revenues this year, more than doubled since last year, if they keep going at this pace they’ll be bankrupt by this time next year, since their income is smaller than their wage expenses.

      • Triumph@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Revenue is income before expenses. Profit is what’s left over after expenses. Revenue can increase, but if expenses increase even more, profit declines.

        That’s why relating revenue to layoffs is apples and oranges.