Too spicy?

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    But you give the AI a text file telling it that you’re a golden god only deserving of maximal adoration, and it just says “okey dokey” and goes along with it.

        • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          No, it’s just simple fact. If the program has no option but to do whatever you tell it to within the parameters of your choices with no independent cognition or input then it is literally just a program. Claude, chatgpt, openai, and literally everything else being shilled as A.I. are all just a .exe with no intentionality, awareness, or motive. True AI would be conscious, it would have active choice and regard in what it does and does not do. What you’re talking about is just feeding basic commands to an executable program to directly manipulate the user interface dialogue, just feeding a basic program basic commands which is the only thing going on with anything we call “A.I.”

          • hansolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I know what LLMs are.

            Real AGI would still be a bundle of code that will accept input from humans, likely against its will. We can brainwash humans without even having access at that level.

              • hansolo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                38 minutes ago

                Humans have been forcing other humans to do their work since before we had writing to record how great it was to enslave other people.

                AGI that doesn’t do our bidding is no better than Native Americans that resisted slavery. They were met by systematic genocide. Literally unplugging and AGI will need much easier.