• belochka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Any ideas why it’s always Matrix? Not even XMPP.

        With not very performant servers and not very rich choice of clients, and still work in progress. And notably more fit for group chats rather than anything private and secure.

        It’s just Matrix being popular?

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          xmpp sucks balls for this scenario. there are incredible footguns in encrypted xmpp, it wasn’t there from day one and mind you it’s intended for non-nixos users. they have migrated from threema

          • belochka@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I suppose. NOSTR-based Marmot is being developed now, it seems more interesting for me than XMPP or Matrix, but it’s still a new thing.

        • Señor Mono@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Maybe. Or they got the feeling to use a low-effort open protocol, that isn’t xmpp. I mean, they considered open whisper, for example, they would have to invest in a custom client.

          With matrix they slap a new sticker on the software and call it a day.

      • fullsquare@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I mean, yeah. But it’s not some national open source project, and that was claimed. Also, i’d like to know how intensely it was audited, because it’s something different from open-source matrix homeserver/element-x (it’s the propertiary part of it)

        polish army used it too before this one, but it wasn’t intended for sensitive info