NEW YORK (AP) — Kamala Harris “wrote off rural America” during the 2024 presidential campaign and failed to attack Donald Trump with sufficient “negative firepower,” according to a long-awaited post-election autopsy released on Thursday by the Democratic National Committee.

The committee’s chair, Ken Martin, shared the 192-page report only after facing intense internal pressure from frustrated Democratic operatives concerned with his leadership. Martin had originally promised to release the autopsy, only to keep it under wraps for months because he was concerned it would be a distraction ahead of the midterms as Democrats mobilize to take back control of Congress.

  • CaptMurica@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    My vote is earned, Democrats couldn’t be bothered and Top Cop asserted she would not be changing Biden’s course if she won. The blame is ALL on the Democrats.

    • baronvonj@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      One of the candidates on the ballot will be sworn into office whether you vote or not. So regardless if you’re voting for someone or against someone, it’s foolish to silence your only voice in the selection process.

      • CaptMurica@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Who says I didn’t vote? I have and will continue to vote Green as both GOP and Dems had loudly committed to continuing the genocide. Which was absolutely a dealbreaker for many, many voters.

        • baronvonj@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Voting 3rd party at the state and federal level in a district without some form of RCV or an encumbent 3rd party representative is pretty much a counter-productive to giving greater political power to your preferred end of the political spectrum. It’s just lowering the number of votes the opposing end of the spectrum needs to win because of our first-past-the-post plurality winner-takes-all system. Yes, I know it’s a corrupt system working as designed by those in power. Quoting myself from another thread where included sources for all this:

          We won’t get rid of the two-party system by voting for losing 3rd party candidates. At present there are a grand total of 3 (out of 535) federal legislators who are not either Democratic or Republican. Bernie Sanders ran in the Democratic primary for Senate in 2008, winning the nomination but then declining it to run as an Independent. Kevin Kiley was first elected as a Republican and then declared as Independent after several years in office. In all state legislatures combined, there are a total of 6 state senators and 22 state representatives out of 7,578 total state legislative seats. There hasn’t been a single electoral college vote for a presidential 3rd party candidate sine 1968, and Perot won 19% of the national popular vote in 1992! Unless you already live in a district with ranked choice voting or with an independent elected official, the odds of displacing either of the major parties is effectively zero. So your best opportunity for reform is still to vote for such candidates at the state level in the major party primary.

          For county and below, have at it. If your state/federal rep is already 3rd party or independent and not getting trounced in public approval, keep them. If your district has RCV, definitely support 3rd party. but in the other 99.5% of districts, voting Green at state and federal level is just making easier for a Republican to win.

          • CaptMurica@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Cry harder or push your shit ass party to earn some fucking votes because none of what you wrote means a damned thing.

            • baronvonj@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              push your shit ass party to earn some fucking votes

              Voting in the primary is exactly how we can most effectively do that.

              none of what you wrote means a damned thing.

              You can choose to ignore observable facts all you want, but that won’t change the reality of them.

              • CaptMurica@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                The primaries they simply decided not to run. You are a simp for an intentionally broken system.

                • baronvonj@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Ah, so full circle ignoring that there were, in fact, primaries held (albeit with two states not including the presidential race on their primary ballots, which as I already said, fuck those guys). I do wish there had been serious challengers to vote for in that race.

      • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        With the shamefully antiquated Electoral College still in place, that’s an interesting push. Of course, that’s assuming there is an election. 😶‍🌫️

        • baronvonj@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          At present I believe the only way to get past the EC is with National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. And the only way to get that is to elect state legislators who will support adopting in. The only way to get them on the general election ballot to be elected is to vote for them in the primary. And since our current reality is that over 99% of state and federal legislators are Democratic or Republican, I believe we can only get those people who support electoral reform elected by nominating them in either the Democratic or Republican primary. It’s an actionable thing that we can all do today that doesn’t require any systemic reform to have already taken place and it’s backed by observable reality. Do you have an alternate suggestion?

              • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                16 hours ago

                “Up shit creek” and all that.

                Isn’t that how the ol’ idiom goes, or does it differ regionally?

                Regardless, it’s a handy one to have in the archive. 🤓

                • baronvonj@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  oh I’ve always heard it “up shit creek without an oar.” When you said paddle I was thinking like table tennis. 😅

                  • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    16 hours ago

                    Ha! I like that spin on the adage! You’re at one end of the table, looking down the barrel at the opponent’s wind-up and realize you’re about to attempt to return with that. 🫩